Background Belonging: Exactly how Stereotypical Cues Perception Gender Involvement into the Computer Science

Background Belonging: Exactly how Stereotypical Cues Perception Gender Involvement into the Computer Science

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., and you will Steele, C. M. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045–1060. doi:/a0016239

Sex Jobs 82 (3-4), 127–141

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. An effective., Montoya, Good. K., and you will Jiang, L. (2017). Exactly why are Specific Base industries Even more Gender Balanced As opposed to others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1–thirty five. doi:/bul0000052

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and you may Hudson, L. (2013). The new Stereotypical Computer Scientist: Gendered media Representations as the a barrier so you’re able to Introduction for ladies. doi:/s11199-013-0296-x

Sex Opportunities 69 (1-2), 58–71

Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, Age., and you can Lo, L. (2013). Manage gender-research Stereotypes Expect Research Identification and you will Research Community Dreams Certainly one of Undergraduate Research Discipline? Soc. Psychol. Educ. 16 (4), 541–554. doi:/s11218-013-9232-8

Destatis (2019). Studierende within the Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: Youngsters in the mathematics, pc technology, technology and techology (STEM) fields . Retrieved regarding

Diekman, A great. B., Steinberg, Yards., Brown, Elizabeth. Roentgen., Belanger, A great. L., and Clark, Elizabeth. K. (2017). A target Congruity Model of Character Admission, Engagement, and Get-off: Insights Public Goal Procedure during the Stalk Gender Gaps. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142–175. doi:868316642141

Eagly, A beneficial. H., and you may Karau, S. J. (2002). Role Congruity Concept out of Bias towards Female Frontrunners. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573–598. doi:-295x.109.step 3.573

Eagly, A. H., and you may Timber, W. (2012). “Social Part Principle,” inside Handbook out of Ideas away from Social Therapy, Volume II. Publishers P. van Lange, Good. Kruglanski, and you will Age. Higgins (Los angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458–476. doi:446249222.n49

Eaton, A great. Good., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, Roentgen. K., and you can West, K. (2020). Exactly how Gender and Competition Stereotypes Impact the Development of Scholars from inside the STEM: Professors’ Biased Product reviews out of Physics and you will Biology Article-Doctoral Candidates. doi:/s11199-019-01052-w

Else-Quest, Letter. Meters., Hyde, J. S., and you can Linn, Meters. C. (2010). Cross-national Models out of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A beneficial Meta-Research. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103–127. doi:/a0018053

Gender Equality Agency Cupboard Work environment (2017). Gender Equality Light Report (Sum Version. Tokyo, Japan: Light paper toward gender equality 2017 . Recovered of

Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A beneficial., and you may Brooks, A. W. (2015)pared so you can Men, Feminine Examine Professional Development because Just as Attainable, but Quicker Common. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. You S A good. 112 (40), 12354–12359. doi:/pnas.1502567112

Gray, J. An excellent., and you can McN). The fresh new Neuropsychology regarding Nervousness: An enquiry into the Qualities of pal System. Oxford: Oxford School Force .

Greenwald, A good. G., McGhee, D. Elizabeth., and you will Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Calculating Private Variations in Implicit Knowledge: This new Implicit Connection Decide to try. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480. doi://0022-.six.1464

Gudykunst, W. B., and you will Lee, C. M. (2003). Examining the Validity from Care about Construal Balances. Humm Res 31 (2), 253–274. doi:/j.1468-.tb00838.x

Heilman, M. Elizabeth., and Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: A lack of Fit Structure. Group Techniques. Intergroup Interactions 21 (5), 725–744. doi:430218761587

Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, An effective., Kano, K., Minamizaki, Good., McKay, Age., and Yokoyama, H. M. (2019). Parental Egalitarian Attitudes to the Gender Opportunities Apply to Arrangement to your Girls Taking Stalk areas on school from inside the Japan. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254–2270. doi:635

Ikkatai, Y., Minamizaki, A beneficial., Kano, K., Inoue, A beneficial., McKay, Age., and you will Yokoyama, H. M. (2020). Gender-biased Public Effect out-of Stalk sphere, Centering on the Influence out of Egalitarian Attitudes on Gender Positions. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3/dos.19010208

Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, G., Dukala, K., and you can Szastok, Meters. (2020). morsian turkkilainen This new Base Graduate: Shortly after Graduation, Someone Currently Differ when you look at the Work Consequences, Attributions for achievement, and you can Wanted Jobs Characteristics. J. Soc. Things 76 (3), 512–542. doi:/josi.12392

Kemmelmeier, M. (2016). Cultural Differences in Questionnaire Reacting: Situations and you may Insights in the Study of Response Biases. Int. J. Psychol. 51 (6), 439–444. doi:/ijop.12386

Keine Kommentare vorhanden

Schreibe einen Kommentar