The brand new dependency exposure influenced by brand new Liquor Use Disorders Identification Decide to try (AUDIT) is 6
The first concerns about epidemiological data was the fresh nine issues about Assist survey. The fresh participants was basically expected especially if they had utilized the compounds protected by the fresh new survey. Desk 2 suggests the utilization percent per test in addition to attempt quantities according to it is possible to differences between the fresh new samples.
Guys who were married, separated, or coping with someone the got a lesser Otherwise than just those in an excellent LAT matchmaking (Otherwise hitched, 0
Table 2 demonstrates participants out of Paramaribo mentioned even more tend to that they had made use of a material in the past-with the exception of cocaine, opiates, and you may unpredictable content-than those into the Nickerie. In examples, as much as 74% of your respondents got made use of alcohol; 44.6% inside Paramaribo and you can thirty-six.6% inside the Nickerie had made use of cigarette. They certainly were and the most widely used compounds.
4% within the Paramaribo and 5.8% during the Nickerie. That isn’t a difference. Both in areas, extremely respondents (on the 93%) just weren’t at risk (Audit score 0–7). A team of about 6% had an average chance (Audit get 8–15) and you may throughout the 1% a top chance or most likely addiction and you may punishment (Audit score > 15).
Dining tables step 3 and cuatro give an overview of the possibility of habits throughout the a couple of examples on the other group categories. For the Paramaribo, the risks to possess more youthful participants (11%) while the male respondents (sixteen.5%) was indeed significantly high regarding years and you can gender. The fresh participants into the higher knowledge met with the low exposure (dos.9%) certainly most of the knowledge account. Single and you will divorced someone encountered the high threats (ten.4% and you will nine.3%) to possess civil condition and you can respondents with a good Javanese background met with the reasonable chance (step 3.2%) when you compare cultural records. The fresh unemployed respondents and also the handymen (one useful to do occasional domestic solutions and you will slight reong brand new job. During the Nickerie, i saw about three extreme distinctions: a man respondents met with the highest risk (15%), while the did participants with a blended records (15.5%). People with a great Javanese history met with the lowest exposure (step three.2%) therefore the respondents operating full-time and the handymen met with the high dangers (10.1% and 28.9%). Inside the next analyses, we computed you to definitely, on age group significantly less than forty years, the risk of addiction was about 18.5% in guys and you can throughout the 3% in women (into the Paramaribo plus Nickerie). On the age group over 40 years, the risk of habits involved a dozen.5% inside the guys and you will from the 1.3% in females. The risk for habits is actually hence such as saturated in younger dudes, but not in women.
I made use of univariate logistic regression so you’re able to assess the odds percentages having habits chance based on knowledge top, civil condition, ethnic history, and you may day to day activities for people in components. We noticed zero high differences in female your of the categories when you look at the Paramaribo or Nickerie. I did come across a notably lower chance proportion for males with an enthusiastic Indonesian background (Or, 0.143; 95% CI, 0.036–0.574; p = 0.006) in Nickerie than in others teams. Men respondents which have a lower or secondary knowledge level got a good high Or (And for low studies, cuatro.971; 95% CI posta sipariЕџi evlilik istatistikleri, step one.52–; p = 0.008; And for secondary education, 5.54; 95% CI, step 1.64–; p = 0.006) than others which have a top studies peak during the Paramaribo. 214; 95% CI, 0.084–0.0541; p = 0.001; Or divorced, 0.269; 95% CI, 0.078–0.9362; p = 0.039; Or lifestyle to one another, 0.323; 95% CI, 0.124–0.843; p = 0.021).
The market details is tall predictors out-of habits risk. However, predictive electricity is lower (Cox and you can Snell R square 0.096 and you will Nagel Roentgen rectangular 0.22).
Keine Kommentare vorhanden